 |
I realize this isn't a sculpture,
but I don't have pictures yet.
Monotype by the awesome
artist Lynn Peterfreund. She
makes pictures of crows!!! |
So I totally failed to complete the A to Z blog challenge. I had
ideas for X, Y and Z, honest- I pooped out because I spent the last four days of April
getting paid to hang out without my pants on artist modeling for a renowned master sculptor & his class
in the middle of nowhere on an idyllic farm in Ashfield, MA. I love artist modeling, and most of my best (and probably most ridiculous) ideas come to me while I am sitting very still in the nuddypants, being busily turned into art by very nice people who think I am a very good model except for all that pesky breathing stuff. (To be fair, they only voice the
occasional wistful desire for me to cease being alive long enough for them to get the shadows on my ribcage right.) I thought up some swell themes for my final posts:
Exhilarated and
exultant for X (no, I don't consider it cheating - wouldn't you rather read a post about something I actually
think about from time to time as opposed to some obvious and laborious excuse for an entry like Xanthippe or Xylophone? - although it should be noted here that my family does own a very fine xylophone, a large one, in a traveling case with stand, no less);
yearning for Y; and
zest for Z.
But to be totally honest, they're just variations on a theme. You want me to talk about zest? (No, I realize you didn't say you did. It's a rhetorical whatsit.) Okay, this thing here I said about vividness, it's basically about zest. Let me sum up my zest post for you: zest is a way of experiencing the world as
being vivid and awesomely
full of gifts. It's cool and stuff and it makes you excited and adventurous. Great, that's done. How 'bout yearning? BAM,
this post is totally about yearning. Exultance? I pretty much got you
right here. (Also, why is "exultance" not a word? One can be exultant;
what one feels when one is exultant should be exultance. "Exultation" is a word, but it seems wrong to me, like a
thing and not a state of being. I feel exactly the same way about the word
evocative, although it is passive instead of active, which just makes things worse - one can find a thing evocative, a thing can evoke something in us, but
what we feel when something is evoked in us is not
evocation - a clunker of a word, without any hint of an
essence contained in it - it ought to be
evocativeness, or something. Also, eher I am tempted to make a slanderous remark about the idiotic use of Proust's
Remembrance of Things Past and his stupid madeleine-induced memory as an example of an evocative experience. I always found it entirely too ham-handed and convenient a recollection to fit what I understand the word
evocation to mean. The origin lies in the sense of calling up or calling forth, as in spirits or demons, and I have always thought it is an entirely more delicate and evanescent process than Marcel's "ah, dissolving cookie! Hmm, what's this I recall? Of course, tea with aunt Leonie on Sunday mornings!" But I digress.)